New satellite data reveals forest loss far greater than expected in Brazil Amazon

first_imgThe Brazilian Amazon lost 184 km2 of forest in December 2017, 20 times more than was recorded in December 2016 (9 km2).The massive increase reflects Brazil’s use of a more accurate satellite monitoring system that incorporates radar, which can see land cover at night and through clouds, and suggests prior deforestation rates were likely underestimates.As the cost of radar and other satellite data decreases, continuous monitoring will enable officials and civil society to more accurately monitor and quantify forest loss over a broad range of spatial scales. The Brazilian Amazon lost 184 km2 of forest in December 2017, according to the country’s Institute of Man and the Environment of the Amazon (Imazon). The data, obtained exclusively by the Brazilian news network GLOBO, show a significant increase in deforestation over that of December 2016, when just 9 km2 of deforestation was recorded.More than a new surge in deforestation, this massive increase actually reflects an improvement in Brazil’s capacity to measure rainforest extent. Imazon, an environmental NGO that monitors the Amazon region, now incorporates radar imagery from the European Space Agency (ESA)’s new Sentinel-1 satellite. Launched into space in 2014, the Sentinel-1 is used to monitor everything from the Arctic thaw to earthquakes, oil spills, and volcanoes.“Since August, we have been implementing the use of new sensors in [our] monitoring. We started with a higher-resolution sensor, which detects small-scale deforestation, and this month we implemented a satellite with radar images,” says Imazon’s Antônio Victor Fonseca, part of the team responsible for the monitoring system. “Now we can monitor the forest even when there is cloud presence. It is an advantage that did not exist in the Amazon until today.”An Amazon basin river with intact forest canopy on both sides. Photo credit: Rhett A. ButlerBrazil’s highly advanced forest monitoring system has always faced the challenge of detecting land cover during cloudy periods. Its standard optical satellite imagery works much like the human eye observing the planet from above. Clouds form a visual barrier, preventing the satellite from seeing the Earth below.Radar can monitor land cover even through clouds, a big advantage during the Amazon’s rainy season.Unlike standard satellite images, which indicate the reflectance of light off objects on the Earth’s surface and thus require the sun’s radiation, radar emits its own radiation, which hits the Earth and bounces back to its sensor, even at night or in cloudy conditions.Detecting the deforestation that takes place during dark or rainy periods affords this new assessment greater accuracy than previous analyses. Using data from the new satellite, Imazon produced a more accurate satellite-based map of deforestation in regions with heavy cloud cover last month. The data indicate that the area around the Transamazon highway in the state of Pará experienced the country’s most extensive deforestation, with 83% of the alerts detected in the month. The remaining forest loss alerts occurred in the states of Rondônia (9%), Mato Grosso (6%), Amazonas and Roraima (1% each).Clear-cutting in the Amazon rainforest as viewed from above by airplane. Satellite data from radar can also detect clearings at night or through cloud cover. Photo credit: Rhett A. ButlerMore than half of the forest clearing (55%) was done on private lands. Another 35% was provoked by agrarian reform settlements in Amazonia. Nearly 10% of the deforestation detected was in official protected areas, including sustainable use areas and indigenous lands.Technology advances have substantially lowered the cost of satellite data, which can expand its use to a broader audience.“Radar is not exactly new technology, but until recently it was very expensive,” said Rômulo Batista, coordinator of Greenpeace’s Amazon program. “Now that it is available, it is of fundamental importance to use this tool to monitor the Amazon in the rainy season.”Amazon forest clearings are often near rivers. Illegal logging may leave a forest strip to avoid detection from the ground. Photo credit: Rhett A. ButlerBatista believes that satellite monitoring played a key role in reducing deforestation between 2004 and  2012. However, illegal loggers have learned to evade satellite detection by cutting trees at night or during rainy season or by clearing narrow roads that cannot be easily detected from above.“With the new satellite, continuous monitoring will prevent this from happening. It will also be possible to detect small clearings before they become scorched earth,” said Batista.Gilberto Câmara, a researcher at Brazil’s National Institute of Space Research (INPE), said that official deforestation monitoring, which is done using INPE’s system, meets the country’s needs.“It is important to generate new information,” he said, “but the problem of deforestation in the Amazon is not the quality of the information provided. It is the government’s lack of interest in combating deforestation.”According to Imazon’s Fonseca, scientists still need to analyze the data to understand what is causing deforestation in these regions, including the impact of new roads.“We need field information,” he added. “But we are seeing some areas of illegal logging, considerable deforestation in settlements, and [human] pressure in some protected areas of Rondônia.”A logging road through Amazon rainforest. If thin enough, these roads may go undetected by low-resolution satellite imagery. Photo credit: George PowellFEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the editor of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page.Banner image of western Amazon forest at the river’s edge. Photo credit: Sue Palminteri Article published by Sue Palminteri data, Deforestation, Forests, Logging, Mapping, Protected Areas, Rainforests, Remote Sensing, satellite data, Satellite Imagery, Technology, Tropical Forests, Wildtech center_img Popular in the CommunitySponsoredSponsoredOrangutan found tortured and decapitated prompts Indonesia probeEMGIES17 Jan, 2018We will never know the full extent of what this poor Orangutan went through before he died, the same must be done to this evil perpetrator(s) they don’t deserve the air that they breathe this has truly upset me and I wonder for the future for these wonderful creatures. So called ‘Mankind’ has a lot to answer for we are the only ones ruining this world I prefer animals to humans any day of the week.What makes community ecotourism succeed? In Madagascar, location, location, locationScissors1dOther countries should also learn and try to incorporateWhy you should care about the current wave of mass extinctions (commentary)Processor1 DecAfter all, there is no infinite anything in the whole galaxy!Infinite stupidity, right here on earth.The wildlife trade threatens people and animals alike (commentary)Anchor3dUnfortunately I feel The Chinese have no compassion for any living animal. They are a cruel country that as we knowneatbeverything that moves and do not humanily kill these poor animals and insects. They have no health and safety on their markets and they then contract these diseases. Maybe its karma maybe they should look at the way they live and stop using animals for all there so called remedies. DisgustingConservationists welcome China’s wildlife trade banThobolo27 JanChina has consistently been the worlds worst, “ Face of Evil “ in regards our planets flora and fauna survival. In some ways, this is nature trying to fight back. This ban is great, but the rest of the world just cannot allow it to be temporary, because history has demonstrated that once this coronavirus passes, they will in all likelihood, simply revert to been the planets worst Ecco Terrorists. Let’s simply not allow this to happen! How and why they have been able to degrade this planets iconic species, rape the planets rivers, oceans and forests, with apparent impunity, is just mind boggling! Please no more.Probing rural poachers in Africa: Why do they poach?Carrot3dOne day I feel like animals will be more scarce, and I agree with one of my friends, they said that poaching will take over the world, but I also hope notUpset about Amazon fires last year? Focus on deforestation this year (commentary)Bullhorn4dLies and more leisSponsoredSponsoredCoke is again the biggest culprit behind plastic waste in the PhilippinesGrapes7 NovOnce again the article blames companies for the actions of individuals. It is individuals that buy these products, it is individuals that dispose of them improperly. If we want to change it, we have to change, not just create bad guys to blame.Brazilian response to Bolsonaro policies and Amazon fires growsCar4 SepThank you for this excellent report. I feel overwhelmed by the ecocidal intent of the Bolsonaro government in the name of ‘developing’ their ‘God-given’ resources.U.S. allocates first of $30M in grants for forest conservation in SumatraPlanet4dcarrot hella thick ;)Melting Arctic sea ice may be altering winds, weather at equator: studyleftylarry30 JanThe Arctic sea ice seems to be recovering this winter as per the last 10-12 years, good news.Malaysia has the world’s highest deforestation rate, reveals Google forest mapBone27 Sep, 2018Who you’re trying to fool with selective data revelation?You can’t hide the truth if you show historical deforestation for all countries, especially in Europe from 1800s to this day. WorldBank has a good wholesome data on this.Mass tree planting along India’s Cauvery River has scientists worriedSurendra Nekkanti23 JanHi Mongabay. Good effort trying to be objective in this article. I would like to give a constructive feedback which could help in clearing things up.1. It is mentioned that planting trees in village common lands will have negative affects socially and ecologically. There is no need to even have to agree or disagree with it, because, you also mentioned the fact that Cauvery Calling aims to plant trees only in the private lands of the farmers. So, plantation in the common lands doesn’t come into the picture.2.I don’t see that the ecologists are totally against this project, but just they they have some concerns, mainly in terms of what species of trees will be planted. And because there was no direct communication between the ecologists and Isha Foundation, it was not possible for them to address the concerns. As you seem to have spoken with an Isha spokesperson, if you could connect the concerned parties, it would be great, because I see that the ecologists are genuinely interested in making sure things are done the right way.May we all come together and make things happen.Rare Amazon bush dogs caught on camera in BoliviaCarrot1 Feba very good iniciative to be fallowed by the ranchers all overSponsoredlast_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *