Artificial Intelligence, early warning, Human-wildlife Conflict, Marine, Mobile, Oceans, Sharks, Software, Surveillance, Technology, Wildtech Article published by Sue Palminteri Popular in the CommunitySponsoredSponsoredOrangutan found tortured and decapitated prompts Indonesia probeEMGIES17 Jan, 2018We will never know the full extent of what this poor Orangutan went through before he died, the same must be done to this evil perpetrator(s) they don’t deserve the air that they breathe this has truly upset me and I wonder for the future for these wonderful creatures. So called ‘Mankind’ has a lot to answer for we are the only ones ruining this world I prefer animals to humans any day of the week.What makes community ecotourism succeed? In Madagascar, location, location, locationScissors1dOther countries should also learn and try to incorporateWhy you should care about the current wave of mass extinctions (commentary)Processor1 DecAfter all, there is no infinite anything in the whole galaxy!Infinite stupidity, right here on earth.The wildlife trade threatens people and animals alike (commentary)Anchor3dUnfortunately I feel The Chinese have no compassion for any living animal. They are a cruel country that as we knowneatbeverything that moves and do not humanily kill these poor animals and insects. They have no health and safety on their markets and they then contract these diseases. Maybe its karma maybe they should look at the way they live and stop using animals for all there so called remedies. DisgustingConservationists welcome China’s wildlife trade banThobolo27 JanChina has consistently been the worlds worst, “ Face of Evil “ in regards our planets flora and fauna survival. In some ways, this is nature trying to fight back. This ban is great, but the rest of the world just cannot allow it to be temporary, because history has demonstrated that once this coronavirus passes, they will in all likelihood, simply revert to been the planets worst Ecco Terrorists. Let’s simply not allow this to happen! How and why they have been able to degrade this planets iconic species, rape the planets rivers, oceans and forests, with apparent impunity, is just mind boggling! Please no more.Probing rural poachers in Africa: Why do they poach?Carrot3dOne day I feel like animals will be more scarce, and I agree with one of my friends, they said that poaching will take over the world, but I also hope notUpset about Amazon fires last year? Focus on deforestation this year (commentary)Bullhorn4dLies and more leisSponsoredSponsoredCoke is again the biggest culprit behind plastic waste in the PhilippinesGrapes7 NovOnce again the article blames companies for the actions of individuals. It is individuals that buy these products, it is individuals that dispose of them improperly. If we want to change it, we have to change, not just create bad guys to blame.Brazilian response to Bolsonaro policies and Amazon fires growsCar4 SepThank you for this excellent report. I feel overwhelmed by the ecocidal intent of the Bolsonaro government in the name of ‘developing’ their ‘God-given’ resources.U.S. allocates first of $30M in grants for forest conservation in SumatraPlanet4dcarrot hella thick ;)Melting Arctic sea ice may be altering winds, weather at equator: studyleftylarry30 JanThe Arctic sea ice seems to be recovering this winter as per the last 10-12 years, good news.Malaysia has the world’s highest deforestation rate, reveals Google forest mapBone27 Sep, 2018Who you’re trying to fool with selective data revelation?You can’t hide the truth if you show historical deforestation for all countries, especially in Europe from 1800s to this day. WorldBank has a good wholesome data on this.Mass tree planting along India’s Cauvery River has scientists worriedSurendra Nekkanti23 JanHi Mongabay. Good effort trying to be objective in this article. I would like to give a constructive feedback which could help in clearing things up.1. It is mentioned that planting trees in village common lands will have negative affects socially and ecologically. There is no need to even have to agree or disagree with it, because, you also mentioned the fact that Cauvery Calling aims to plant trees only in the private lands of the farmers. So, plantation in the common lands doesn’t come into the picture.2.I don’t see that the ecologists are totally against this project, but just they they have some concerns, mainly in terms of what species of trees will be planted. And because there was no direct communication between the ecologists and Isha Foundation, it was not possible for them to address the concerns. As you seem to have spoken with an Isha spokesperson, if you could connect the concerned parties, it would be great, because I see that the ecologists are genuinely interested in making sure things are done the right way.May we all come together and make things happen.Rare Amazon bush dogs caught on camera in BoliviaCarrot1 Feba very good iniciative to be fallowed by the ranchers all overSponsored A new tech-driven device may help reduce harmful interactions with sharks and improve people’s tolerance of one of the ocean’s top predators.The system, called Clever Buoy, combines sonar to detect a large object in the water, artificial intelligence to determine that the object is a shark close enough to threaten beachgoers, and automated SMS alerts to lifeguards that enable them to take action.Local governments have deployed the system at popular beaches and surfing sites to test its capacity to protect swimmers and surfers without harming marine wildlife. Sharks are in trouble worldwide, with one study estimating that people kill up to 100 million of them each year through illegal fishing, shark finning, and bycatch.The negative public view of sharks as aggressive killers limits empathy for the ocean’s largest fish, even though only 33 of over 500 species have been known to bite people, and 63 percent of reported attacks have been by three species: tiger, bull, and great white sharks.A sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) swimming. These sharks inhabit coastal areas but dine on fish, crabs, and rays and are considered not dangerous to people. However, commercial fisheries targeted these sharks for their relatively large dorsal fins, and the species is now listed as vulnerable. Photo credit: Brian Gratwicke CC 2.0Shark-human interactions have increased as people spend more time in the ocean and as more attacks are actually reported. Of the 88 unprovoked shark attacks reported in 2017, five were fatal; to put that into perspective, more people die of lightning strikes than shark attacks.Limitations of existing shark attack prevention strategiesPrevious efforts in Australia to protect surfers and swimmers have relied on nets—which trap not just sharks but also rays, dolphins, and turtles—or drum lines, lengths of baited hooks attached to the seabed that aim to catch and drown passing sharks, as well as direct culling of sharks.These methods have not proved successful in eliminating shark attacks, and killing the ocean’s top predators, while harming other species in the process, negatively affects marine ecosystems.More recent non-invasive efforts to detect sharks have included trained shark-spotting teams, electromagnetic devices that attach to surfboards, and expensive seabed-to-surface barriers. Some areas in Australia and Brazil have set out non-lethal “smart” nets and drum lines to capture and tag passing sharks that are then monitored by beacons that receive the “ping” of the animal’s tracking tag.Each of these methods has had limited success. High-energy surfing zones along Australia’s coast present challenges to maintaining nets and other physical barriers, while tagged sharks may represent a fraction of a total population.The floating Clever Buoy tested at Bondi Beach near Sydney, Australia. The buoy is connected to sonar units installed on the sea floor that create a ‘virtual’ net, rather than a physical barrier that can harm not just sharks but other marine animals. Photo courtesy of Smart Marine SystemsSince 2016, the government of New South Wales, Australia, has been testing a series of new technologies to address the increased number of shark sightings. One of these, a tethered buoy integrating sonar, artificial intelligence, and cellular phone technologies, has shown promise as a non-lethal, non-invasive means of detecting and identifying sharks and alerting officials of their presence near beaches.Shark-finding technologyDetection: The 35-kilogram (77-pound) solar-powered Clever Buoys, developed by Smart Marine Systems (SMS), float on the ocean surface, communicate with devices on shore, and attach to sonar transducers mounted onto a pier or the ocean floor. Each system’s sonar sends out acoustic signals that bounce off objects in the water. It then measures the strength of the returning signal and the time it takes to return to determine the size, distance, and direction of the object.Installing the Clever Buoy’s seabed frame with the sonar transducer on the ocean floor. Photo courtesy of Smart Marine SystemsThe sonar reaches objects in the water column up to 120 meters (394 feet) away, so multiple units can be positioned to create a virtual shark net that “sees” underwater, which lifeguards and aerial surveillance cannot. It uses a frequency that is substantially higher than the hearing range of known marine animals, to avoid adverse impacts on wildlife.The units are set up in an array that is configured according to the form of the beach, SMS founder and executive director Craig Anderson told Mongabay-Wildtech. “Generally it is sitting 400-500 meters [1,310-1,640 feet] from the sand, and then it’s looking out to sea to basically create a virtual barrier or virtual net, and anything that comes within that zone gets identified and analyzed,” he said.The virtual net created by two Clever Buoys each connected to three sonar transducers at City Beach, near Perth, Australia. Photo courtesy of Smart Marine SystemsIdentification: Sharks swim in patterns that differ from those of dolphins, turtles, or rays. The Clever Buoy system runs software called SharkTec that uses AI to identify sharks over 2 meters (6 feet) long based on their movements and distinctive acoustic signature.“It’s a pattern recognition algorithm of the distinct swimming patterns of various marine life,” Anderson said.Engineers at SMS and sonar maker Tritech developed SharkTec by adapting software used to detect marine life around oil rigs and tidal turbines with data on shark movements collected over several years.They “trained” the software by incorporating the shark movement data into the AI algorithms to automate the recognition of sharks through these signature movement patterns; the resulting software distinguishes sharks from other animals by their size, speed, and swim pattern.Alert: When the system determines that a nearby object is likely a shark, it signals lifeguards, who can respond by closing the beach or other action. The system transmits the alert within a few seconds via text message and special mobile phone app with the shark’s location and likelihood that it is a threat. It can also integrate the alert into local emergency services messaging to the public.SMS is still adapting the system to distinguish among different shark species. Most species mainly avoid people, so the developers and collaborators have also installed the system inside Sydney’s Sea Life Aquarium to test its ability to differentiate among shark species and prevent harmless species from triggering an alarm. A major objective of the NSW Shark Management Strategy is to reduce interactions between beachgoers and sharks while minimizing harm to the area’s marine wildlife.A SharkTec sonar capture of a tiger shark moving from right to left, based on its size and swim movement pattern. Tiger sharks are one of three species responsible for most attacks on humans. Image courtesy of Smart Marine SystemsTesting and retestingThe Clever Buoy developers, together with the NSW government and researchers from the University of Technology Sydney, tested the system, in combination with aerial surveillance, drone surveillance, shark tagging and mobile apps, as part of a larger shark management program to reduce the incidence of shark bites along the NSW coast.SMS has since tested the buoys at beaches near Sydney and Perth in Australia, as well as at a World Surf League competition in South Africa.Early tests consisted of placing the Clever Buoy system about 1 kilometer (0.6 miles) offshore, beyond the surf zone, in about 10 meters (33 feet) of water, at well-used beaches. The testing team positioned an underwater video camera nearby to record for up to five hours each day and compared the captured images to the information received from the Clever Buoy to visually verify sharks that the sonar system detected.In this video from University of Technology Sydney, a curious great white shark investigates the Clever Buoy’s underwater sonar setup during a test off the central coast of New South Wales, Australia. The testing team used the video imagery to verify shark detections made by the Clever Buoy system.The Australian Professional Ocean Lifeguard Association said in a statement that a three-month trial of the system in 2016 at Bondi Beach near Sydney was a success, “with Clever Buoy logging and alerting numerous shark detections, many of which were able to be positively validated through visual identification by the Bondi professional ocean lifeguards.”The system also successfully identified great white sharks on the NSW central coast, with video footage confirming the detection of the sharks during the trial.Tests around Perth had mixed results. Local newspaper The West Australian reported that two buoy units detected 38 “possible” sharks, which led to 19 beach closures, but that “the system was unable to distinguish between different types of marine animals, let alone species of sharks.”Anderson said the AI software was a developing technology. “The more time we spend in the water, the more the algorithm develops, the more accurate the system gets,” he said. “It’s a continuum of development, it never stops. Like any pattern recognition development, it’s all about having that library, that catalog of imagery to teach the system and for the system to continually learn.”Tiger sharks, such as this one with remoras, have stripes on their sides that fade with age. Second only to white sharks in terms of the number of attacks on humans, tiger sharks actually feed on a wide range of prey, including fish, birds, seals, turtles, crustaceans, sea snakes, and smaller sharks. Photo credit: Albert Kok, CC 3.0The company is now deploying a set of Clever Buoy units at beaches in Southern California. It will lease the system to the city of Newport Beach for between $10,000 and $15,000 per month for six transponders.The platform has been shown to operate continually in open ocean conditions, autonomously monitoring marine life and alerting authorities when large swimming objects appear to be sharks that may threaten beach users. The Clever Buoy is beginning to carry additional sensors that record environmental indicators, including wave height and swell, water temperature, and levels of certain pollutants and acidity.FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the editor of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page.